Skip to content

P200 | Health-1.1 fix#5465

Open
suredhar wants to merge 1 commit into
openconfig:mainfrom
b4firex:P200_Health-1.1_fix-1
Open

P200 | Health-1.1 fix#5465
suredhar wants to merge 1 commit into
openconfig:mainfrom
b4firex:P200_Health-1.1_fix-1

Conversation

@suredhar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skip the test on "No Cisco line card CPU base components found," because the P200 Mustang is a fixed box without line cards.

@suredhar suredhar requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2026 10:43
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request modifies the system health testing suite to prevent false failures on the P200 Mustang platform. By adjusting the test to skip when line card components are absent, the suite now correctly handles hardware configurations that do not utilize modular line cards.

Highlights

  • Test logic adjustment: Updated the TestLineCardsNoHighCPUSpike test to skip execution rather than throwing an error when no line card CPU components are detected.
  • Platform compatibility: Added support for the P200 Mustang platform, which is a fixed-box architecture that does not contain modular line cards.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@OpenConfigBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Functional Test Report for #5465 / ed33e15

Virtual Devices

Device Test Test Documentation Job Raw Log
Arista cEOS status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check
Cisco 8000E status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check
Cisco XRd status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check
Juniper ncPTX status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check
Nokia SR Linux status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check
Openconfig Lemming status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check

Hardware Devices

Device Test Test Documentation Raw Log
Arista 7808 status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check
Cisco 8808 status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check
Juniper PTX10008 status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check
Nokia 7250 IXR-10e status
Health-1.1: Generic Health Check

Help

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request modifies the TestLineCardsNoHighCPUSpike test to skip execution when Cisco linecard CPU base components are missing, replacing the previous error reporting. The reviewer recommends using t.Fatalf instead of t.Skip because the absence of these critical components should be considered a fatal failure in health check tests. Furthermore, the feedback notes that the log message should adhere to Go style guidelines by being lowercase and omitting trailing punctuation.

}
if len(baseLCs) == 0 {
t.Errorf("ERROR: No Cisco linecard CPU base components found")
t.Skipf("Skip the test on No Cisco linecard CPU base components found.")
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Use t.Fatalf instead of t.Skip when critical components like Cisco linecard CPUs are not found, as their absence should be considered a fatal test failure in health check tests. Additionally, ensure the message follows Go style: lowercase and no trailing punctuation.

Suggested change
t.Skipf("Skip the test on No Cisco linecard CPU base components found.")
t.Fatalf("no Cisco linecard CPU base components found")
References
  1. Go style guidelines specify that error and status messages should be lowercase and not end with punctuation. (link)
  2. When monitoring critical processes in a test, use t.Fatalf if a process is not found, as its absence should be considered a fatal test failure.
  3. In tests, t.Fatalf is preferred over t.Errorf when a failure makes subsequent test steps meaningless, as this fails fast and reduces overall test execution time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants